AI/LLM tool policy: failure

Even Rouault via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

It was nice trying but I believe we can close the experiment as a 
failure. At least I personally cannot deal with the mental consequences 
in term of reviewing. To make it short, I believe humans aren't designed 
to be at the receiving end of LLM generated content. This is a too 
unnatural relationship. More details in this thread: 
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-April/068204.html

So what to do now... ? Personally I believe I'll give up on reviewing 
LLM generated PRs. If there are other devs with merge rights who want to 
give them a try, please raise your arm. Otherwise, if there are not, 
we'll have to revise the policy to better reflect our wishes and abilities.

Even

-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.