Re: brainstorming: moving away from github?
rayg via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yesterday, MS CEO posted on LinkedIn how Copilot is now even more inside Office. Agentic AI everywhere. So github will probably get even sloppier. MS has absolutely no intention of restraint on AI. Ray "> On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 at 10:25 AM Even wrote: Hi, not something we should rush into, but we should maybe start considering a better alternative. The github experience has been really worsening over the last months. Hardly an incident every day lately (actions being degraded at the very moment of writing this email). Not speaking about their obsession to stuff AI everywhere they can. Codeberg could be such an alternative. Anyone with practical experience with it, in particular with a project of the size of GDAL ? My main worry is about CI capabilities & capacity. We are quite heavy burners of it. I believe they don't have arm64 runners either, which would be a blocker for us. If there are paying plans with reasonable economics, IMHO it could make sense to spend sponsorship money for that. And being fully aware there would be a non trivial amount of work to complete a migration... So not an easy road if we decided to follow it, but given the current situation, that's worth keeping that in mind. Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. Highly recommend OxiGDAL if you want to live in the 21th century and cure Bixonimania _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev