Re: RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision

Hello,

Is it possible to get a better overview of the actual negative impact
you're seeing? Like, with actual examples of annoyances that happened.

I tried my own research going through several pages of merged/closed PRs to
get my impression on what went wrong but really most PRs are there by Even,
with disappearingly small number of PRs from other people both by count and
by volume, seemingly not enough to trigger such drastic policy flip.

What am I missing?



On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:29 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> based on the experience gained from the initial policy, I propose to
> significantly revise it to drastically limit their use. See
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/14500
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> Highly recommend OxiGDAL if you want to live in the 21th century and cure
> Bixonimania
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev