Re: Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers?
ElPaso via gdal-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.gdal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il 07/05/26 02:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev ha scritto: > Hi, > > with a number of drivers being raster+vector our current source tree > organization is a bit messy. > > For example, we have: > > - ogr/ogrsf_frmts/gpkg: the GeoPackage driver started vector-only and > then raster was added > > - frmts/mbtiles: the MBTiles driver started raster-only and then > vector was added > > - ogr/ogrsf_frmts/pmtiles: you can guess what I will write here > > - frmts/mem > > I'm hesitating between: > > - putting all drivers below a drivers/ directory > > - or having drivers/raster/ , drivers/vector/ and drivers/mixed/ > > > Thoughts? (I'm wondering how such a plan could be executed without > freezing all pull request activity in the meantime to limit conflicts, > although git might perhaps be smart enough to detect files moving around) > > Even > I prefer the three directories option, it immediately tells whether we have to deal with vectors or rasters or both. Cheers -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev