Re: r.slope.aspect with -n flag giving aspect of flat areas as -9998

Anna Petrášová <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel
Message-ID <CAE0EDEo-H7RmPpx78oOjCXv_EKAU1LsNHZYEXO2zbh1w22tWyw@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, please create an issue on github:
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/new/choose

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 6:49 AM Pedro Venâncio <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was testing r.slope.aspect with the "new" -n flag, also to include -e
> and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of
> flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL,
> and the output data type is CELL.
>
> https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html
>
> I've tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both
> in the GUI and CLI.
>
> (Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
>
> r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
> slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS
> precision=CELL
> Percent complete...
> Elevation products for mapset <PERMANENT> in <SRTM_PT_25m>
> Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
> Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
> Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
> Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
> (Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)
>
> r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@PERMANENT
>
>
>  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>  | Map:      SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@  Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24
> 2020    |
>  | Mapset:   PERMANENT                      Login of Creator:
> PedroVenancio   |
>  | Location: SRTM_PT_25m
>    |
>  | DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78
>    |
>  | Title:    Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
>     |
>  | Timestamp: none
>    |
>
>  |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |
>    |
>  |   Type of Map:  raster               Number of Categories: 360
>     |
>  |   Data Type:    CELL
>     |
>  |   Rows:         23200
>    |
>  |   Columns:      11360
>    |
>  |   Total Cells:  263552000
>    |
>  |        Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
>    |
>  |            N:     278000    S:    -302000   Res:    25
>     |
>  |            E:     164000    W:    -120000   Res:    25
>     |
>  |   Range of data:    min = -9998  max = 360
>     |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Data Source:
>     |
>  |    raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
>     |
>  |
>    |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Data Description:
>    |
>  |    generated by r.slope.aspect
>     |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Comments:
>    |
>  |    aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
>     |
>  |    zfactor = 1.00
>    |
>  |    min_slope = 0.000000
>    |
>  |
>    |
>  |    r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation="SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT"
> slo\   |
>  |    pe="SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS"
> aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\   |
>  |    S" format="degrees" precision="CELL" zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
>     |
>  |
>    |
>
>  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> (Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)
>
>
>
> Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:
>
> (Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
>
> r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
> slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
> Percent complete...
> Elevation products for mapset <PERMANENT> in <SRTM_PT_25m>
> Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
> Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
> Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
> Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
> (Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)
>
> (Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
>
> r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2@PERMANENT
>
>
>  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>  | Map:      SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_  Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020
>    |
>  | Mapset:   PERMANENT                      Login of Creator:
> PedroVenancio   |
>  | Location: SRTM_PT_25m
>    |
>  | DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78
>    |
>  | Title:    Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
>     |
>  | Timestamp: none
>    |
>
>  |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |
>    |
>  |   Type of Map:  raster               Number of Categories: 360
>     |
>  |   Data Type:    FCELL
>    |
>  |   Rows:         23200
>    |
>  |   Columns:      11360
>    |
>  |   Total Cells:  263552000
>    |
>  |        Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
>    |
>  |            N:     278000    S:    -302000   Res:    25
>     |
>  |            E:     164000    W:    -120000   Res:    25
>     |
>  |   Range of data:    min = -9999  max = 359.8097
>    |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Data Source:
>     |
>  |    raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
>     |
>  |
>    |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Data Description:
>    |
>  |    generated by r.slope.aspect
>     |
>  |
>    |
>  |   Comments:
>    |
>  |    aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
>     |
>  |    zfactor = 1.00
>    |
>  |    min_slope = 0.000000
>    |
>  |
>    |
>  |    r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation="SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT"
> slo\   |
>  |    pe="SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2"
> aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\   |
>  |    ASS_2" format="degrees" precision="FCELL" zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
>    |
>  |
>    |
>
>  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> (Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)
>
>
> The elevation map I'm using is this one:
> https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif
>
> As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to
> +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.
>
> Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as
>
> | Title:    Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
>
> which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.
>
> Could these be bugs?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards,
> Pedro Venâncio
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.