Re: Calling all imagery (especially i.maxlik and i.smap) users

Maris Nartiss <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel,gmane.comp.gis.grass.user
Message-ID <CAK8GbeB63XLncSpjg0vH-NS0JwPwP3K8E+q3a6QGNez3nF-R3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Brad.
piektd., 2020. g. 8. maijs, plkst. 05:36 — lietotājs Brad ReDacted
(<[email protected]>) rakstīja:
>
> Hello,
>
> IIRC, signatures cannot be handled as colors without significant modification to api.
>
> Is there a particular reason for not improving the API to be map portable and remove subgroups from modules that do not explicitly require it?

Thanks also to Veronica and Sajid for feedback :-)
Yes, that's the whole point of this thread — to find out more how
people use GRASS image groups so they can be changed (requiring
breaking API, GRASS database structure).

Last night I couldn't sleep and came up with a sound idea of replacing
subgroups with semantically sounder alternative that would allow to
make group independent signature files. Concept still needs some
thinking over and writing/drawing. If anyone is willing to help in
changing imagery support for GRASS 8, let me know.

Māris.

PS. More user stories are still welcome :-)
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.