Re: Call for changes in the Python library

Hi,

From my experience, the temporal framework is rather quirky, and might be
in need of refactoring to fix some of those quirkiness (see for example
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/629).
Most of it might be done without breaking the API, but the new major
version could be an opportunity to break things for the better.

Cheers,
Laurent


Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 21:29, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> Now would be a great time to do any large or small changes in the Python
> library. Let's discuss these. For example, there was a talk about more
> clear splitting of the ctypes dependent and independent code in
> grass.pygrass, about moving the library to a different place, there is the
> new grass.grassdb subpackage, PEP8/Black/Flake8, ... Is there anything
> *you* see as a priority for 8.0? Is there anything you can do before 8.0?
> Let's coordinate here.
>
> Best,
> Vaclav
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev