Re: Read-access to data in a different location with same SRS
Luca Delucchi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK4m-3z8ndkLELO4syLxr841N6VO8pBuUzqLodJXvje_+fd-Lw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:02, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > It was great seeing some of you last night via jitsi ! > > In the context of the discussion of "location" vs "project", several of us pointed to the fact that we organize our data into locations by reference system with mapsets as project directories. PERMANENT (and other mapsets) can then be used for data that is common to many projects and can thus be accessed read-only from their respective mapsets. This helps avoiding data duplication across projects. > > In the perspective where each location is a project we this would somehow get lost, as this concept invites duplication into each project. > > However, Luca raised an interesting point in the chat which we didn't get to discuss: it might be possible to define some mechanism to make data in one location readable from another location as long as they are in the same SRS. An easy and dirty way is obviously to just use symbolic links as Luca seemed to suggest, but that means there is no control over the actual correspondence of location definitions. Also I don't know how cross-platform this would be. > > But maybe we could take this idea and create a more sophisticated mechanism, extending g.mapsets to allow creating a read-only access to mapsets even outside the current location, as long as the reference systems are identical (would just requiring the PROJ files to be identical be enough ? Too restrictive ?). > > This would possibly allow to go further in the idea of organizing data by projects instead of locations, while also keeping > the idea of avoiding data duplication (people could create base data projects with data common to many projects). > > How does that sound ? > I support any idea that could be useful for GRASS, and I think project could bring more users, however I would like to continue to work as I do today and I think this is the main idea of Vaclav, if I understood correctly. If we want switch to project I think we should remove all the references to Location (in doc and code) > Moritz > -- ciao Luca www.lucadelu.org _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev