Re: minor tweak to new website
Michael Barton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree one word is better than two. Maybe just current. Michael Barton School of Human Evolution &Social Change School of Complex Adaptive System Science Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Arizona State University ...Sent from my iPad On Jan 15, 2021, at 9:35 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:12 PM Michael Barton <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: You are correct about the redundancy. I was trying to make the change as minor as possible. A somewhat better listing would be GRASS GIS 7.8.5 (current stable) GRASS GIS 7.6.1 (legacy) [change from “old”] GRASS GIS 7.9 (preview) [“development” is OK, but “preview” sounds more inviting for use] +1 for legacy and especially preview, I like that a lot! I'm unsure about "current stable". It seems like one of the works might be enough. I thought stable should be enough, but PostgreSQL actually uses Current in documentation just be itself. Isn't there a noun "release" implied in each of those? Aren't all releases stable unless noted otherwise? Isn't then "stable" redundant? Anyway, I like the proposal even as is. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev