Re: Should we use GitHub Discussions?
Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:49:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABo5uVvCR1D7iHijjg023gZhoj+VSDveezWy7pB5Yp5NMF0t-g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:40 AM Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:49 PM Luca Delucchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 08:49, massimo di stefano > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > ‘’’ > >> > I think emails (and mailing lists) are awesome, but mailing lists > are increasingly seen as archaic and not accessible > >> > ‘’’ > >> > > >> > What about migrating our mailing list to mailman3? > >> > The postorius interface looks modern and when integrated with hyper > kitty, allows an easy access to the list archives (including search and > post statistics). > >> > > >> > >> I fully agree with this proposal, but this should be done at OSGeo > >> Level, Massimo do you want to investigate this solution with SAC? > > Did anyone open a ticket for that? I didn't see it yet in case. > > > Or I can click on that one checkbox in GitHub settings. :-) > > Not sure. > Please also note that QGIS is actually closing their GitHub > Discussions for reasons also having mentioned here. > See > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html > If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be having a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev