Re: Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8

On 10/02/21 13:16, Nicklas Larsson wrote:
> It would be most favourable for all contributors and the project if the 
> community could come to an agreement on this topic. I see no reason to 
> postpone a decision on this much longer.
> 
> The final word on this need to be that of the PSC's. Whether through 
> simple vote or a RFC. However, a sounding of the opinion of the 
> dev-community on this matter is of equal importance and can be of help 
> for the PSC.

Thanks a lot, Nicklas, for this very comprehensive summary !

A suggestion made at the first meeting of the new PSC was to use this 
discussion as a use case for a more extensive usage of RFC's to put 
important decisions into more permanent documents than mailing list 
archives and to provoke a formal decision as you suggest. Would you be 
willing to write a first draft of such an RFC ?

Moritz