Re: r.stream.extract error

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Giuseppe Amatulli <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Markus  M.
>
> I was testing the r.stream.extract for 2 tiff
>
> 1) 80040 x 72870 = 5,832,514,800 i got the stream results - no error

Great, that means large maps with more than 2 billion cells are supported.
>
> 2) 80490 x 142690 = 11,485,118,100 i got the following error
>
> A* Search...
> 0..2../var/spool/slurmd/job6514787/slurm_script: line 80: 28925 Bus error
              r.stream.extract elevation=elv accumulation=upa threshold=0.5
depression=dep direction=dir stream_raster=stream memory=45000 --o --verbose

From wikipedia:
"a bus error is a fault raised by hardware, notifying an operating system
(OS) that a process is trying to access memory that the CPU cannot
physically address: an invalid address for the address bus, hence the name."

I guess you either need to raise the RAM limit in slurm or slightly reduce
the memory option for r.stream.extract.

Markus M

>
> Do you think that is something with the slurm ram limitation or is
something with the r.extract.stream?
> If the the stream output have a number of stream segments larger than
2,147,483,647 what is happen?
> Do I get an error or all the value larger than   2,147,483,647 are just
rounded to 2,147,483,647 ?
>
>
> Moreover, if use the stream obtain from option 1) and I use the stream as
input for the r.stream.basins
> I got the following error
>
> reading raster map <stream>...
>
0..3..6..9..12..15..18..21..24..27..30..33..36..39..42..45../var/spool/slurmd/job6514788/slurm_script:
line 82: 17687 Bus error
/gpfs/home/fas/sbsc/ga254/.grass7/addons/bin/r.stream.basins -l
stream_rast=stream direction=dir
>
> is this something that need to be fixed in r.stream.basins, or should i
think that is due to other problems
>
> Thank you
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
>
> On 10 November 2017 at 11:21, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Markus Metz
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Giuseppe Amatulli
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Markus!!
>> >> I will test and I will let you know how it works.
>> >
>> > Your feedback is very helpful!
>> >>
>> >> I have few  more questions
>> >> 1) now how much is the upper limit matrix cell number that
>> >> r.stream.extract can handle?
>> >
>> > About 1.15e+18 cells.
>> >
>> > Another limitation is the number of detected stream segments. This
must not
>> > be larger than 2,147,483,647 streams,
>> ...
>>
>> (Added as a note to
>>  https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_GIS_Performance#Some_benchmarks
>> )
>>
>> best,
>> markusN
>
>
>
>
> --
> Giuseppe Amatulli, Ph.D.
>
> Research scientist at
> Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies
> Yale Center for Research Computing
> Center for Science and Social Science Information
> New Haven, 06511
> Teaching: http://spatial-ecology.net
> Work:  https://environment.yale.edu/profile/giuseppe-amatulli/

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user