Re: Calling all imagery (especially i.maxlik and i.smap) users
Maris Nartiss <[email protected]> Fri, 8 May 2020 14:02:59 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel,gmane.comp.gis.grass.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK8GbeB63XLncSpjg0vH-NS0JwPwP3K8E+q3a6QGNez3nF-R3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello Brad. piektd., 2020. g. 8. maijs, plkst. 05:36 — lietotājs Brad ReDacted (<[email protected]>) rakstīja: > > Hello, > > IIRC, signatures cannot be handled as colors without significant modification to api. > > Is there a particular reason for not improving the API to be map portable and remove subgroups from modules that do not explicitly require it? Thanks also to Veronica and Sajid for feedback :-) Yes, that's the whole point of this thread — to find out more how people use GRASS image groups so they can be changed (requiring breaking API, GRASS database structure). Last night I couldn't sleep and came up with a sound idea of replacing subgroups with semantically sounder alternative that would allow to make group independent signature files. Concept still needs some thinking over and writing/drawing. If anyone is willing to help in changing imagery support for GRASS 8, let me know. Māris. PS. More user stories are still welcome :-) _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev