Re: ST_Intersect issue on Postgis 3.5.0

Erik Wienhold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.postgis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2024-10-16 07:59 +0200, Łukasz Szałek via postgis-users wrote:
> I have run a couple of tests on Postgresql 17 with Postgis 3.5.0
> Have you ever met such a situation that:
> 
> Case 1: On PG 15.3 with Postgis 3.3.7
> 
> POSTGIS="3.3.1 3786b21" [EXTENSION] PGSQL="150" GEOS="3.11.0-CAPI-1.17.0" PROJ="7.2.1" LIBXML="2.9.1" LIBJSON="0.11"
> 
> QUERY: SELECT st_intersects(ST_GeomFromText('LINESTRING(20.4181889 52.2294573, 20.4181297 52.2293530)',4326), ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((20.4184446 52.2300275, 20.4184364 52.2299621, 20.4183278 52.2297000, 20.4182316 52.2294864, 20.4181977 52.2294529, 20.4181239 52.2294898, 20.4181889 52.2294573, 20.4182713 52.2295927, 20.4183541 52.2297635, 20.4184219 52.2299443, 20.4184446 52.2300275))',4326));
> 
> Produces:
> 
> ERROR:  GEOSIntersects: TopologyException: side location conflict at 20.418188900000001 52.2294573. This can occur if the input geometry is invalid.
> 
> Case 2: On PG17.0 with Postgis 3.5.0
> POSTGIS="3.5.0 d2c3ca4" [EXTENSION] PGSQL="170" GEOS="3.13.0-CAPI-1.19.0" PROJ="9.5.0 (compiled against PROJ 9.13.0) LIBXML="2.9.13" LIBJSON="0.14" LIBPROTOBUF="1.3.3" WAGYU="0.5.0 (Internal)"
> 
> Same QUERY: SELECT st_intersects(ST_GeomFromText('LINESTRING(20.4181889 52.2294573, 20.4181297 52.2293530)',4326),
> ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((20.4184446 52.2300275, 20.4184364 52.2299621, 20.4183278 52.2297000, 20.4182316 52.2294864, 20.4181977 52.2294529, 20.4181239 52.2294898, 20.4181889 52.2294573, 20.4182713 52.2295927, 20.4183541 52.2297635, 20.4184219 52.2299443, 20.4184446 52.2300275))',4326));
> 
> Produces: True
> 
> Is it some kind of regression?

This could also be caused by the different libgeos versions (3.11.0 vs
3.13.0 in your case).  I've seen such errors with libgeos <=3.11,
whereas it worked with 3.12 on other setups with identical PostGIS
version and data.

-- 
Erik
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.