Re: Possible Bug in postgis_restore

Sandro Santilli via postgis-users <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Mar 2026 23:45:47 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gis.postgis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a big, could you please file it on https://trac=2Eosgeo=2Eorg/postg=
is ?

Il 26 marzo 2026 09:17:32 CET, "Aussem, Robert (LGL extern) via postgis-us=
ers" <postgis-users@lists=2Eosgeo=2Eorg> ha scritto:
>Hello,
>
>during a Migration from postgis 3=2E1 to 3=2E5 using the Script postgis_r=
estore i found a strange behaviour:
>
>In our Database we had a Table named layer in a Schema that didn't belong=
 to postgis=2E After the run of postgis_restore the Table didn't exist and
>the Import had errors when it tried load Data in this Table=2E In a verbo=
se run i saw this:
>
>SKIP: TABLE layer
>
>Here postgis_restore seemed to ignore the Schema=2E
>
>Is it common practice not to use Tables named layer in a postgis enabled =
database or could this be a Bug?
>
>Yours sincerely
>
>Robert Aussem
>

--=20
Sent from hand-held device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E