Re: Possible Bug in postgis_restore
Sandro Santilli via postgis-users <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Mar 2026 23:45:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.postgis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a big, could you please file it on https://trac=2Eosgeo=2Eorg/postg= is ? Il 26 marzo 2026 09:17:32 CET, "Aussem, Robert (LGL extern) via postgis-us= ers" <postgis-users@lists=2Eosgeo=2Eorg> ha scritto: >Hello, > >during a Migration from postgis 3=2E1 to 3=2E5 using the Script postgis_r= estore i found a strange behaviour: > >In our Database we had a Table named layer in a Schema that didn't belong= to postgis=2E After the run of postgis_restore the Table didn't exist and >the Import had errors when it tried load Data in this Table=2E In a verbo= se run i saw this: > >SKIP: TABLE layer > >Here postgis_restore seemed to ignore the Schema=2E > >Is it common practice not to use Tables named layer in a postgis enabled = database or could this be a Bug? > >Yours sincerely > >Robert Aussem > --=20 Sent from hand-held device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E