Re: Future maintainance releases
Kristian Evers <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:29:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 14:45, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bas Couwenberg <[email protected]> writes: > >> [info about proj6 migration status] > > From my perspective on packaging many things, proj's trajectory of > deprecations is already feeling very rapid compared to how many things > depend on it. Realize that people are still in the process of getting > off qt4. > > pkgsrc is in a similar position to Debian, although less well baked, > with proj6 in wip (sort of like Debian unstable, but not really), and > having to define ACCEPT_USE_OF_DEPRECATED_PROJ_API_H to keep some things > building. > > I don't want to have multiple proj versions in pkgsrc,a nd I don't want > to prclude libosmium, libspatialite, mapnik. > > I feel that the "rip the bandaid off" notion is counterproductive, as it > really means "break things for users so that packagers have to decide > between old proj and dropping dependencies”. I don’t think that is a fair way to lay it out. From the beginning we've had a “double-feature” in the release schedule for the 7.0.0 release with an accompanying 6.x-release. This is still the plan and if it turns out to be necessary we can put out more releases of the 6.x branch later on. Users of proj_api.h should be taken care of for at least a year or two more with the 6.3.1 release. But at some point support for 6.x has to stop. I don’t want to see us move into Python2 territory! /Kristian > > The real question is whether removing it would be a real gain, or just a > club to get people to update. Certainly it's going to happen, but I > think it would be good to let the dust settle on proj6 first. It feels > like we as a larger osgeo community are making progress on that and in 6 > months or so I'd expect the situation is much better. > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj