Re: PSC Motion: require SQLite 3.11 as minimum version

I am also +1 on this. I am just wondering if 3.11 is the lowest possible
version that is feasible to use with PROJ. From the linked issue I understand
that SQLite 3.8.x is too slow and that it works with 3.11. I take it that 3.11 was
chosen because it was readily available for Even. Would 3.9 or 3.10 work
as well? Or was there a specific change in 3.11 that we know is the one that
makes the difference?

/Kristian

> On 7 Nov 2019, at 18:14, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On jeudi 7 novembre 2019 17:49:26 CET Thomas Knudsen wrote:
>> +1
>> (convinced by the evidence and reasoning provided by Greg and Bas, although
>> it would be nice if we in any practical way could "suggest", rather than
>> "require" >=3.11)
> 
> No, this is really a functional requirement to get nominal behaviour of the 
> library. Otherwise runtime experience will be terrible (it is not like running 
> with older sqlite is 10% slower. It is 1 to 2 order of magnitude slower. see 
> the ticket) and people will complain. If people really want to run against 
> older versions, they can easily change configure.ac/CMakeLists.txt to remove 
> the check, but at least they will know that they're doing risky games and 
> hopefully they won't complain to community forums that it is slow.
> 
> -- 
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj