Re: PSC Motion: require SQLite 3.11 as minimum version
Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:53:50 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACmBxysmBHocWy0GYFpKG6o4did9i89trGi54QYoJU3VCd7Zpw@mail.gmail.com> |
+1 Kurt If sqlite 3.11.0 is a blocker for a distribution, should they really be talking about proj 6? Nothing is jumping out at me looking at https://sqlite.org/changes.html as to the version, but 3.11.0 seems safe. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kristian Evers <[email protected]> wrote: > I am also +1 on this. I am just wondering if 3.11 is the lowest possible > version that is feasible to use with PROJ. From the linked issue I > understand > that SQLite 3.8.x is too slow and that it works with 3.11. I take it that > 3.11 was > chosen because it was readily available for Even. Would 3.9 or 3.10 work > as well? Or was there a specific change in 3.11 that we know is the one > that > makes the difference? > > /Kristian > > > On 7 Nov 2019, at 18:14, Even Rouault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On jeudi 7 novembre 2019 17:49:26 CET Thomas Knudsen wrote: > >> +1 > >> (convinced by the evidence and reasoning provided by Greg and Bas, > although > >> it would be nice if we in any practical way could "suggest", rather than > >> "require" >=3.11) > > > > No, this is really a functional requirement to get nominal behaviour of > the > > library. Otherwise runtime experience will be terrible (it is not like > running > > with older sqlite is 10% slower. It is 1 to 2 order of magnitude slower. > see > > the ticket) and people will complain. If people really want to run > against > > older versions, they can easily change configure.ac/CMakeLists.txt to > remove > > the check, but at least they will know that they're doing risky games > and > > hopefully they won't complain to community forums that it is slow. > > > > -- > > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > http://www.spatialys.com > > _______________________________________________ > > PROJ mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj