Re: Preferred grid format for transformations?
Even Rouault <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Nov 2019 22:09:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1824479.mY7Kx9EFK2@even-i700> |
Brian, > The National Geodetic Survey is considering changes to the grids we > output for transformations, geoids and more and I was wondering if there > are currently any preferred or ideal grid formats in the PROJ > community? I have been doing a little research as well as seen a few > threads recently that mentioned GeoTiff, NetCDF and HDF5 but wanted to > see if you guys had any preferences? This is indeed a "hot" topic. I've submitted today a Request for Comments to the PROJ (and larger) community, whose one of the main topics is a discussion about adopting a GeoTIFF format: https://github.com/rouault/PROJ/blob/rfc4_remote_and_geotiff_grid/docs/source/community/rfc/rfc-4.rst#grids-in-geotiff-format > A few things that will be coming in 2022 include grids for 3D > velocities, uncertainties for grids (geoids, transformations) and more > so some of the things discussed like having multidimensional information > at each node would be nice. I assume here that by "multidimensional" you mean storing several samples per grid node, where the grid is still 2D indexed (referenced to a geographic longitude, latitude CRS typically) ? The above GeoTIFF proposal should be able to allow this. Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj