Re: Proposal for a geodetic deformation model format
Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Dec 2019 20:41:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Geomatys |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Chris Thanks for your reply. Le 05/12/2019 à 19:00, Chris Crook a écrit : > As you rightly say there is also a lot value in a standardisation > process with OGC, though of course that is a (much much) longer process. > Just for information, from the presentation we had at OGC, it seems that ESRI wants to go relatively fast too (1~3 years in my understanding). > On HDF5 vs GeoTIFF.. As you rightly say apart from some details this > proposal is largely format agnostic. I know the ESRI GGXF initiative > is now proposing using HDF5, and certainly that could serve as well. > A possible approach could be to put table(s) mapping the document attributes to CF-Conventions attributes when a match exists (i.e. to draft what it would looks like if the data were in a HDF5 file). It may help to compare the formats. But I realize that it would require more work, this is not a request. > Curiously I did propose HDF5 as an option for deformation models a > while ago, but at that time there wasn't much appetite for using it as > (IIRC) it wasn't so well suited to deploying with online web services. > Its seems that HDF5 viewers exist in JavaScript since 2016 [1], and other readers are yet more recent [2]. Maybe they were missing at time of your proposal. But I admit that HDF5 support in browsers is not as old as GeoTIFF supports. > (…snip…) I found as I was developing this proposal that there seemed > to be more advantages to a multiple file implementation. Because > GeoTIFF provides the nested grid capability the number of files is not > excessive (unlike the LINZ publication format as individual grids). > One advantage is that different versions of the deformation model will > only differ in a few of the component files. Most would be common to > the versions, so using a multiple file implementation allows these to > be shared. > Thanks for the insight. Together with Even questions in his previous email it help me to understand better. Regards, Martin [1] https://github.com/HDF-NI [2] https://github.com/usnistgov/jsfive _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj