Re: Could we release new Accerciser version ? Last one was on 2016-09-20

apinheiro <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:29:28 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.accessibility.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.accessibility.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------167D278302A03A81B85E789C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 14/1/19 9:59, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
> Le 12/01/2019 =C3=A0 11:01, apinheiro a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just rolled a new Accerciser release. It is basically all
>> included on master since the last release. You can see the details on
>> the announcement I have just send.
>
> Thank you very much Alejandro for this.


You are welcome.


>
>> Ideally we would need the agreement of current maintainer. But as far =
as
>> I understand your previous email, you didn't get any answer from Javie=
r.
>> Could you confirm that? If we don't get any answer from Javier, the
>> alternative is asking permission at [email protected] (or
>> perhaps at the foundation list).
>
> I've contacted Javier to make the Samuel patches about the iPython5
> support available, he has made the review.
>
> I really respect the Javier work on Accerciser and his involvement on
> accessibility.
> I've contacted him privately the 2018-10-17 about Accerciser release
> without any answer from him.
> I personally consider we shouldn't wait more because I shouldn't have
> to request a new release to a maintainer after years. I assume he no
> longer has the time to work on Accerciser.


Ok, then let's reduce my proposed two-weeks to one week. For two
reasons. First, I always tend to be conservative on this things, and
after all this time, and with a fresh release, waiting just one more
week shouldn't be a big deal. Second, because I bet that on
desktop-devel they will ask how much we waited from our last ping.


>
> @Alejandro: Does Samuel need to have a sponsor to become a maintainer ?=



Well, not sure. This kind of maintainer reassignement without the
previous maintainer available are not usual, so I don't think that there
are a fixed list of requirements. I would personally propose Samuel as
maintainer, and list all the reasons of why that is a good idea. I hope
that's to be enough.


>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex.
>

--------------167D278302A03A81B85E789C
Content-Type: application/pgp-keys;
 name="pEpkey.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="pEpkey.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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3D=3D
=3DGVI/
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

--------------167D278302A03A81B85E789C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel

--------------167D278302A03A81B85E789C--