Re: Geary accessibility
Peter Vágner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.accessibility.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Kyle, I would be interested to know whether you are also suffering from the following Thunderbird issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924915 I am using 4 accounts with some huge imap folders here and I really find this a critical issue no mather which version of Thunderbird I am running higher than Thunderbird 17. Thanks and greetings Peter On 27.06.2014 00:14, Kyle wrote: > I recently tried Geary, Sylpheed, Claws-mail, Balsa and Evolution. All > have various issues that make them nearly unusable with Orca. Balsa is > one of the best other than Thunderbird, but it's hard to read a message > once it's open. The message shows up in a read-only textbox, but the > arrow keys don't work. Everything else works as expected, although the > message list could be just a little less verbose. > > Regarding Geary, I had many of the same problems as described by the OP. > Sylpheed still has an unreadable message list, but I am able to compose > a message, although coming from Thunderbird, that shift+control+e > keyboard shortcut to send a message is a bit counterintuitive, as I'm > used to pressing control+enter to send the composed message. I also > can't open a message in Sylpheed. I like opening messages in their own > windows/tabs, but Sylpheed makes this impossible, or nearly so. Once I > did find a message, I was only able to read portions of it from > something like a preview pane, and couldn't get it into a separate > window or tab. Claws-mail worked, or didn't work, in much the same ways > as Sylpheed. The unreadable message list is also still a problem in the > latest stable version of Evolution, 3.12.3 as of this post. I must > wonder just how hard it could be to render a message list that can be > read by Orca. If it's anything like what I was seeing in some of the > MATE code that had to be done to create accessible objects and make them > speak, I can certainly understand how easy it can be to get it wrong, as > it appears that nearly everything has to be done twice, i.e. the object > has to be created, and then a second accessible object has to be created > in order to speak the first object. That is unless I somehow misread the > code. I'm not all that familiar with how gtk code is supposed to look, > so I could be way off about that part. > > For now, the best solution I've found for reading mail is Thunderbird > nightly builds. They are far more usable than any other graphical > client, including the stable Thunderbird builds. They fixed the problem > where the wrong message was being spoken once a message was deleted from > the list, so the entire experience with Thunderbird nightly is much more > smooth. At this point, I would recommend pulling down a nightly build of > Thunderbird, as it's the best thing going for now, at least until some > of the issues with other clients are fixed. > ~Kyle > http://kyle.tk/