Re: When a photographer uses eog -- some observations
DigiSus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.Eog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello everybody As there was zero response to my email some days ago, which I spent some time putting together, I just want to ask why: Should I better file bugs/feature requests or not put all in one email or you did not like the style or only developer-discussions on this list or ...? I did not expect somebody to discuss each and every point, but I thought to get some reaction. As I am interested to help making eog better, if only from a user perspective, it would help to know why my email was obviously in vain. Thanks for a line or two, Marcus DigiSus wrote: > Dear developers > > From a recent photo weekend workshop I needed to browse, select, delete > and sort >2000 photos. I thought it might be interesting to developers > to learn about my experiences when doing this with eog 2.22.2 (ubuntu > Hardy Heron). > > First of all, it is possible to handle large amounts of photos with eog. > :-) > > But some tasks could be more efficient and some tasks are not (yet) > possible. My observations are strictly from an end-user point of view as > I am a hardcore user and not a developer. Sorry, the email got so long > and thanks for bearing with me. :-) > > > 1) The ever-recurring task is to look at each photo (in fullscreen, > sometimes 1:1 view) in a folder and decide about deleting it or moving > it to another folder. Currently, eog provides only the deleting option > with an irritating confirmation question: > - A preference tick box to suppress the confirmation question after > deletion would save a click with each deletion. That is many clicks. ;-) > - Two ideas for implementing a sorting possibility: Either (a) let > photos be marked (with 'M') and when user leaves F11 mode, s/he can move > all marked photos to a specified folder. Or, (b) allow drag&drop from > the collection pane to move a photo into another folder. > (Now, I delete the photos and get them out of the trash can afterwards > and put them into separate folder. It is an ugly workaround to be able > to stay in F11 mode all the time and save 3x as many clicks...) > > 2) Going to next/prev image. I read that the mouse wheel for going > next/prev was removed, but I do not know why and whether it is possible > to get it back. It would be very helpful. > > Another elegant and visually appealing way could be: When the mouse > touches the right or left border of the screen (in F11 mode), the > next/prev photo is shown. > > 3) In F11 mode, I can zoom in/out of a photo or see it in 1:1 or > windows-fit size. Unfortunately, this setting is not remembered when I > go the next/prev photo. So, I have to zoom again... Maybe, make it a > preference tickbox to remember zoom setting or not. > > 4) The image collection pane and EXIF information are essential features > for this work and I am glad eog provides them. But the properties/EXIF > window takes too muich screen space which I need for the image. And it > is overloaded/confusing. Could something similar to the Ctrl-i feature > from gthumbs be implemented that shows the image/EXIF information in a > small box -while- in F11 mode? I put the properties button in the icon > bar but it does not show during F11. This way, I see no way to see EXIF > data during F11 mode...? > > 5) As to the EXIF information itself: There is no need to write down all > the words "aperture value", "exposure time", etc. because the values > (f/3.2 or 1/125) speak for themselves. > > Here is a use case proposal to think about: When the user presses "i" in > F11 mode, a small semi-transparent box with two lines of text should > appear (and stay with subsequent photos) showing image information. In > preferences, the user can select how much information should be shown: 1 > or 2 lines. Pressing "i" again switches off the info box. > > Example: > > (1st line) > P416724.jpg - (13/437) - 2736x3648 pixels - 3.2MB > (2nd line, optional) > f/5.6 - 1/250s - 85mm - ISO 100 - 05.07.2008 17:13 > > BTW: The value currently given as "Focal length" is not what > photographers expect to see. They need the value in [mm] given under > Details|Camera|FocalLenghtIn35mmFilm. > > 6) Judging photos has a lot to do with aestethics. It would be helpful > if eog would support that by being in the background as much as possible. > Good start: In F11 mode, the background around the photo is black. But > the image collection bar is system grey as is the top icon bar. > - Could the pane have black background as well around the thumbnails, so > that only the thumbnails are visible? > - Could a small/middle/big sizing of thumbnails made in the preferences? > > 7) Often, adjacent photos need to be compared. Could a 2-up or even 4-up > view in F11 mode be implemented that show 2 simultanesouly next to each > other or even 4 in the four quadrants of the screen? (Next/prev would > then mean moving 2 or 4 photos at once.) > > 8) Having a GUI preference to choose where the collection pane should be > shown (bottom top left right) would be helpful. For example, sometimes > the pane makes sense to be at the bottom, but sometimes more efficient > use of the screen space for the photo makes sense and then the pane > should be vertical on one side. > > 9) The last two are not crucial but may win over many people who work > visually: > > 9a) Could we have a smoother scrolling in the image collection pane? > Perhaps it could be done with the mouse hovering over the pane? Moving > far to the right scrolls fast forward, more to the middle scrolls > slower. (think iPod scrolling...) > > 9b) slideshow. To have it look professional (e.g., when showing photos > to a larger audience with music in the background, etc.) it would be > nice to have fading between the photos, in 3 variants: Fade via black, > fade via white, fade directly into next photo. > > Alright, I thank you for reading all this and I hope this feedback is > useful to you. I would be glad to help with further input/feedback/spec > if needed or if you have questions to what I wrote... > > Thanks & best regards, > Marcus > _______________________________________________ > Eog-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/eog-list