Re: GNOME Goal proposal: app menu retirement [[email protected]]
Peter Bloomfield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/04/2018 07:56:58 AM Sat, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > …sorry for jumping into this old discussion, I've been on vacation… … > An other (very unusual) feature of Balsa's IMAP implementation is the distinction between IMAP mailbox, IMAP folder and IMAP subfolder (the latter even not accessible through the config dialogue). The typical (IMHO) IMAP use case is to access the complete folder tree of the remote server, and show/hide certain folders using subscribe/unsubscribe. > > IOW, would it make sense to keep /only/ the “IMAP folder” option, and to drop the other two completely? Would we need a fallback path for old configurations using the IMAP mailbox or subfolder? Opinions? Agreed that 'IMAP mailbox' is obsolete. As I recall, 'New -> IMAP subfolder' is there to manage the IMAP folder tree. The folder context menu allows deletion and rnaming, but I believe that only 'new subfolder' allows creation. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQS030wPRfNNA5alz3MfX9S1uSp09QUCW2YgsgAKCRAfX9S1uSp0 9fSoAJ96G27qdnrow8pH/pSaQmwLcMSTRQCglFlIXOWJR781wpOTgyqwf+Aom9s= =ygrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----