Re: possible new sort option
Peter Bloomfield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi André: On 08/08/2018 09:24:06 AM Wed, andré via balsa-list wrote: > Le 2018-08-06 à 19:40, Peter Bloomfield a écrit : >> On 08/05/2018 11:35:26 AM Sun, Peter Bloomfield wrote: … >> I take it as a consensus that thread-date-sorting should be implemented--right? > > Haven't seen any dissenting opinions >> >> Questions: >> 1. Should it replace head-date-sorting, or be a preference item (defaulting to thread-date)? > > Replacing would keep it much simpler for (especially new) users. > Then the questions becomes threading or not. > >> 2. Should we add an option to *not* gather threads by subject? > > Would favour only by message id and "not* a fall-back by subject, to avoid the problem you outline below. > Having an occasional message shown outside its' thread is much less of a problem. > An option makes it more complicated. If it exists, the default should be to *not* fall-back to subject. I rather think the option may still be needed, perhaps for mailing lists? >> 3. Do we need simple threading? > > One threading method is less confusing. Agreed! Thanks for the thoughts! Absent any last-minute objections, I'll merge the branch into master, replacing head-date by thread-date. I'll open a new branch for the more extensive changes involved in 2 and 3, which require UI and string changes. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQS030wPRfNNA5alz3MfX9S1uSp09QUCW2y74wAKCRAfX9S1uSp0 9b0hAKCJnzdw5MnZtWePAT2YRJdJI+G7gACgjIh5VouC5sANzmWJ475edrGH0ic= =QV03 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----