Re: [Patch] unified server configuration GUI
Albrecht Dreß <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Peter! First, thanks a lot for testing these (bulky) changes! I'll try to split the next steps into smaller chunks… Am 23.10.18 01:04 schrieb(en) Peter Bloomfield: > Thanks for the work, and the patch! It applies and builds[0] [snip] > [0] I had to add an additional FALSE argument to some libbalsa-conf calls in address-book-ldap. Ouch - yes, I forgot to run a text search for the new api (I do not build with LDAP support). I noticed that the LDAP Bind password is stored in plain text in the private config file. Shouldn't we store it obfuscated? This breaks existent non-anonymous LDAP configs, but the only drawback is that the user has to enter the password again. Or we might want to move the libsecret stuff libbalsa-conf, so the password could be stored in the key ring. What do you think? Best, Albrecht. _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEcCEPemLFTtyGf4zATKlvDmfn2fgFAlvPUj0ACgkQTKlvDmfn 2fiVwQf/RY4Gyc1PxzbqOBzCwA/ufr6O4YQR8/tS0StvKds2tJQR07oitwhzBDGl c8dEpS5lw0xZYbhJPwhXDGI5i/K19/ymxOeWkrgvuDvZn14Xdn4Zw/L+BMvf1mXc a98eW+YXWjsLC5HpsETMPaEWCCNZvDYn0HCjJjLUX+MKhe8r2zu7TdSWYwx3ZzIv 2/WM+HXyZiMgRW2WyTQrgMi+m8RtcjOEu5Qhnbxgc9HTaM+Zek8cuehPyA/HzyFR /AC1zava/sVjArN0Ij5K2sHyv4y08mnQokrOLJW97iPu+scNb9oA4Ytn6n0O4BDj yOxmM4DHAGEVO5qpJ9UNdpHNCZhA9g== =RPhv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----