Release [was Re: [Patch] fix broken decryption of s/mime messages loaded from imap]

Peter Bloomfield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Albrecht:

On 02/28/2019 02:39:04 PM Thu, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
…
> However, it raises a more general question – shouldn't we prepare a new release anyway?  I think there have been many improvements since the last one last year.  I still have a new GUI for managing IMAP subscriptions in my pipeline, and I wanted to look into XOAUTH2 for gmail or yahoo (which is *not* safer than the methods Balsa supports now, opposed to what Google claims!), but those shouldn't be show-stoppers.  And the README and help files are really outdated, which seems to be more critical.
> 
> Opinions?

Agreed; quite enough improvements to justify a release!

I just pushed a few more cleanups to README; will try to get to the help files later. It would be good to give the translators a couple of weeks' notice before actually releasing, especially if the help files are changed substantially.

Peter

_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQS030wPRfNNA5alz3MfX9S1uSp09QUCXH7xXQAKCRAfX9S1uSp0
9XfXAKCjZXRVmVK8QKpFtlupnW/wTUI9WwCeNdHJsEy2dA4JfXkWGUSy4Ae2nCk=
=4bpz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.