Re: html content ignored

Hi Michiel:

On 05/24/2019 09:17:11 AM Fri, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello Peter,
> 
> Thanks for your reply,
> 
> On 23-05-19 05:35:58, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> > This seems to be a Fedora packaging issue. Builds from GitLab's master
> > branch show HTML content correctly in my experience. The F30 package
> > seems to link correctly to the webkit lib, but I see the same issue
> > with HTML content.

I was wrong there: it's not the Fedora packaging, it seems to be the tarball <URL:https://pawsa.fedorapeople.org/balsa/balsa-2.5.6.tar.bz2> itself. I just built Balsa from it with:

./configure --with-libsecret --with-gtksourceview --with-gpgme
make
src/balsa

and  again it shows no HTML content.

I'm puzzled about what has happened. I was using Balsa built from git's master branch around the time the tarball was made, and I don't recall any version that had HTML issues. Balsa's HTML code has seen a few changes since 2.5.6 was released, and of course WebKit has been updated continually, but as far as I know none of the changes were related to a blank page.

> So if I understand correctly, upgrading to F30 won't resolve the issue?
> So I guess the best way to proceed is to file a bug at Fedora? I have a
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com account. (Any addional information I should
> submit?)

So no, a Fedora bug would just be bumped upstream, because any build from that tarball can show the issue. Waiting for the forthcoming new release may be the best option.

Best,

Peter

_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQS030wPRfNNA5alz3MfX9S1uSp09QUCXOlBAwAKCRAfX9S1uSp0
9QhoAJ0TAwnRTWkCqgrfGQVbOC4xJI1r+ACghnjLkwmgraqvovbsV/lUvjy3p9Y=
=uMxF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----