Re: [Patch] make GpgME/E2EE support a hard requirement
Peter Bloomfield <[email protected]> Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:35:53 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Albrecht, On 05/30/2019 01:06:10 PM Thu, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Hi all, > > attached is a simple but larger patch which makes GpgME a hard requirement for Balsa – IMHO, a MUA which does not always support End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) is simply a no-no these days! > > As a positive side effect, a bunch of conditional compilations can be removed, making the code better readable. > > Opinions? > > Best, > Albrecht Looks good to me. I checked on my Fedora laptop, and both gpgme and gnupg2 are really central, needed by dnf and who knows what else. Pushed to GitLab. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQS030wPRfNNA5alz3MfX9S1uSp09QUCXPRPSQAKCRAfX9S1uSp0 9dFqAJ9qQr6aLWvI5dLCW6m5JURMo/qo4wCbBfDXlAfA/RV9XUI9+7ANxHR0tJc= =aQvL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----