Re: header question
andré via balsa-list <[email protected]> Sat, 23 May 2020 14:38:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.balsa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 20-05-23 à 12 h 59, Albrecht Dreß a écrit : > Hi Jack! > > Am 23.05.20 18:44 schrieb(en) Jack via balsa-list: >> Not specifically Balsa related, but an email correspondent just asked >> my why my email didn't have a Reply-To: header. I always thought it >> was present, but I see not. Should it be, or should I just tell him >> it is HIS software that is wrong, since it should reply to the From: >> address if there isn't a Reply-To: ? > > Quoting from RFC 5322, Section 3.6.2 > (<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2>): > >>> 3.6.2. Originator Fields >>> >>> The originator fields of a message consist of the from field, the >>> sender field (when applicable), and optionally the reply-to field. >>> […] In either case, an optional reply-to field MAY also be included, >>> which contains the field name "Reply-To" and a comma-separated list >>> of one or more addresses. >>> […] >>> The originator fields indicate the mailbox(es) of the source of the >>> message. The "From:" field specifies the author(s) of the message, >>> that is, the mailbox(es) of the person(s) or system(s) responsible >>> for the writing of the message. >>> […] >>> The originator fields also provide the information required when >>> replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it >>> indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests >>> that replies be sent. In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field, >>> replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the >>> "From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the >>> reply. > > IOW, if the message you sent contains a From: field (it will, as it is > required), it /is/ well-formed, and a Reply-To: would be required /only/ > if you want the reply to be transmitted to a different mailbox. > >> (his complaint is that he always needs to type my address in the To: >> field.) > > Sounds as if that mailer is broken, or the From: field not being > recognised properly for some strange reason. > > Best, > Albrecht. > I'd call that email 101 :) I thought everyone would know that. -- André _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list