Re: GPU Temp. for 2 video cards
Achim Theobald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gkrellm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill WIlson schrieb: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:20:29 -0500 > Bill WIlson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On my System (GF6600) nvidia-settings make none output for GPUCoreTemp. >>> But the tool nvclock from http://www.linuxhardware.org/nvclock/ make >>> this output. Can gkrellm read this value? >> No, but I'll try to get it added in. I should be able to get to it tomorrow. > > I've run into a problem with this. nvclock eats a big chunk of CPU and it > adds 4 seconds to the gkrellm start up time. Running it at the sensor check > interval puts more of a load on the CPU than I want gkrellm to do. Maybe > you can confirm this on your box in case there's something unusual about > my setup? > > I get: > > ~$ time nvclock -T > nVidia Geforce 7600GS > => GPU temperature: 75C > > real 0m1.991s > user 0m1.870s > sys 0m0.117s > > and on another box it goes up to 3.6 seconds real. If you get similar results > you can get an idea of the effect this would have in gkrellm by running: > > $ while true; do nvclock -T -c 2; sleep 4; done > > and watch the gkrellm CPU chart. I get over 1 second 100% CPU bursts > every 5 seconds - ouch! This is nvclock 0.8b2-1 from Debian. > > Do you see this? No. nvclock 0.8b2 on openSUSE 10.2x86_64 with kernel 2.6.20-360-default AMD Athlon64X2/3800/512kB Achim.Theobald@achim:~> time nvclock -T nVidia Geforce 6600 => GPU temperature: 60C real 0m0.138s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.136s Cu Achim _______________________________________________ Gkrellm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.jutley.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gkrellm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGC+Yo/OYKy2ZOSAIRAkHAAKCoGlbSxKYIikK0BL5F9de2LOzYoQCgzqb8 qNwYjiE7cZSN5mZXXZOrwr4= =U8GQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----