Re: Version 2.3.8

Mohammed Fukeeslum <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:43:04 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gkrellm
Message-ID <CACqGjhT=PKLFZVwP_8hSj-h1yOTvBTV7ofzMhstHkofnrihZxA@mail.gmail.com>
Here it is:



 7       0 loop0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       1 loop1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       2 loop2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       3 loop3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       4 loop4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       5 loop5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       6 loop6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   7       7 loop7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 179       0 mmcblk0 2897469 572017 152498931 17184280 16477 16217
1929544 18217870 1 3700820 35407820

 179       1 mmcblk0p1 1362 32529 265297 7480 0 0 0 0 0 4000 7480

 179       2 mmcblk0p2 2895943 539116 152229346 17176590 16477 16217
1929544 18217870 1 3697040 35400200

 252       0 zram0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 252       1 zram1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 252       2 zram2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 252       3 zram3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 252       4 zram4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

   8       0 sda 1544901 232411 72948370 13849610 229533 172858
23544016 224511400 0 11819930 238477310

   8       1 sda1 1544825 232411 72947762 13849550 229533 172858
23544016 224511400 0 11819910 238475220

   8      16 sdb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  11       0 sr0 28 0 200 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 40

On 10/3/16, Bill Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you post a copy your /proc/diskstats so I can look at it?
>
> Bill
>
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:45:13 +0200
> Mohammed Fukeeslum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I wrote the author about it.
>>
>> Back on topic, it seems in 2.3.8 /dev/mmcblk doesn't display anything
>> for a change ;)
>> It doesn't register on the aggregate chart either.
>>
>> On 9/29/16, Bill Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:35:41 +0200
>> > Mohammed Fukeeslum <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> A quick question:
>> >>
>> >> Is the fact I'm seeing cpu frequencies of a client machine (connected
>> >> via `gkrellm -s`) instead of the server a bug in gkrellmd or the
>> >> cpufreq plugin?
>> >
>> > Plugins manage their own data so the cpufreq plugin would need to
>> > be changed.  Plugins that want to send server data need to build a
>> > server
>> > side plugin as well as the normal client side plugin.
>> >
>> > One can look at the plugins reference and the source to the gkrellmwho2
>> > and gkrelltop plugins for examples.  Those two have server plugins that
>> > send server data instead of client data when gkrellm -s is run.
>
>
>