Re: [GNC] Received e-mails in Spams (bad e-mail server configuration / ML configuration)
* Neustradamus * <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Nov 2025 05:12:13 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.user,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AS8PR10MB7427D1227DB7CDE1036B2F1CCBC1A@AS8PR10MB7427.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
--===============0488962472323715982== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, thanks for your answers,=0A= =0A= Note: I have always recent e-mails in Junk Emails/Spams folder.=0A= =0A= Sorry, I have forgotten in more SPF/DKIM/DMARC standards, there are Authent= icated Received Chain (ARC) and BIMI too.=0A= I have added all standard links after.=0A= =0A= The goal is to have good settings and not good automatic e-mails in Junk Em= ails/Spams folder, all e-mail servers must to respect it.=0A= =0A= If other e-mail servers administrators read me, please do same.=0A= =0A= In this gnucash.org case, where I can send full mail logs to fix this probl= em (in all lists)?=0A= - https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo=0A= Who manage the gnucash e-mail server?=0A= =0A= -------------------=0A= =0A= For informations: The standards are here:=0A= =0A= RFC 7208: Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in E= mail, Version 1=0A= - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208=0A= =0A= RFC 6376: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures=0A= - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6376=0A= =0A= RFC 7489: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (= DMARC)=0A= - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489=0A= =0A= RFC 8617: The Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol=0A= - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8617=0A= =0A= I-Draft (not yet a RFC but already implemented in several projects/software= s/companies): Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI)=0A= - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brand-indicators-for-message-ident= ification/=0A= - https://bimigroup.org/=0A= =0A= ----------=0A= =0A= To test the e-mail server: SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI (no test for ARC):=0A= - https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx=0A= =0A= Google search about mailman/postfix and SPF/DKIM/DMARC/ARC/BIMI:=0A= - https://www.google.com/search?q=3Dmailman+SPF+DKIM+DMARC+ARC=0A= - https://www.google.com/search?q=3Dpostfix+SPF+DKIM+DMARC+ARC=0A= - https://www.google.com/search?q=3Dpostfix+BIMI=0A= =0A= Thanks a lot in advance.=0A= =0A= Regards,=0A= =0A= Neustradamus=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: gnucash-user <gnucash-user-bounces+neustradamus=3Dhotmail.com@gnucash= .org> on behalf of Harold Hallikainen via gnucash-user <gnucash-user@gnucas= h.org>=0A= Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2025 06:42=0A= To: [email protected]=0A= Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]=0A= Subject: Re: [GNC] Received e-mails in Spams (bad e-mail server configurati= on / ML configuration)=0A= =0A= I do just SPF and DMARC, both of which are on the dns server. That seems=0A= to work. Dkim looks more complicated sibce it created by the mail server=0A= for each message. Spf and dmarc wirk for me. Good luck=0A= =0A= Harold=0A= Https://w6iwi.org=0A= =0A= =0A= On Fri, November 7, 2025 9:49 pm, [email protected] wrote:=0A= > Thank you for this. A little searching shows that DMARC needs both SPF=0A= > and DKIM, and the header below shows that the DKIM signature did not=0A= > verify. I'm not sure how difficult correcting this problem would be for= =0A= > the mailing list sysops.=0A= >=0A= > =E2=81=A3David T. =E2=80=8B=0A= >=0A= > On Nov 8, 2025, 6:00=E2=80=AFAM, at 6:00=E2=80=AFAM, Harold Hallikainen v= ia=0A= > gnucash-user <[email protected]> wrote:=0A= >> A lot of email servers want SPF and DMARC. The headers are showing SPF= =0A= >> passed, but DMARC failed. Mxtoolbox.com is a great way to see why emails= =0A= >> fsil.=0A= >>=0A= >> Harold=0A= >>=0A= >>=0A= >>=0A= >> On Fri, November 7, 2025 5:16 pm, David Carlson wrote:=0A= >>=0A= >>> I think the problem is not with the GnuCash maillist, but with your=0A= >>>=0A= >> email=0A= >>> service. When an email that you consider to not be spam ends up in=0A= >> your=0A= >>> spam folder, there should be a way to tell your provider that you do=0A= >> not=0A= >>> consider it to be spam.=0A= >>>=0A= >>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 6:46=C3=A2=C2=80=C2=AFPM * Neustradamus *=0A= >>> <[email protected]>=0A= >>> wrote:=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>>> Dear GnuCash team,=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Can you solve the problem of e-mails always detected in "Junk=0A= >>>> Emails"/"Spams" folder?=0A= >>>> SPF/DKIM/DMARC=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> For example, a part of logs:=0A= >>>> ...=0A= >>>> ARC-Seal: i=3D2; a=3Drsa-sha256; s=3Darcselector10001; d=3Dmicrosoft.c= om;=0A= >>>> cv=3Dfail; ... ARC-Authentication-Results: i=3D2; mx.microsoft.com 1;= =0A= >>>> spf=3Dpass=0A= >> (sender ip=0A= >>=0A= >>>> is XXX.XXX.XXX.XX) smtp.rcpttodomain=3Dhotmail.com=0A= >>>> smtp.mailfrom=3Dgnucash.org; dmarc=3Dfail (p=3Dnone sp=3Dquarantine=0A= >>>> pct=3D100) action=3Dnone header.from=3Doutlook.com; dkim=3Dfail (signa= ture=0A= >>>> did not verify) header.d=3Doutlook.com; arc=3Dfail (47) ...=0A= >>>> Authentication-Results: spf=3Dpass (sender IP is XXX.XXX.XXX.XX)=0A= >>>> smtp.mailfrom=3Dgnucash.org; dkim=3Dfail (signature did not verify)=0A= >>>> header.d=3Doutlook.com;dmarc=3Dfail action=3Dnone=0A= >>>> header.from=3Doutlook.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com:= =0A= >>>> domain of gnucash.org designates XXX.XXX.XXX.XX as permitted sender)= =0A= >>>> receiver=3Dprotection.outlook.com; client-ip=3DXXX.XXX.XXX.XX;=0A= >>>> helo=3Dcode.gnucash.org; pr=3DC ...=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> ----------------=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Thanks in advance.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Regards,=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Neustradamus=0A= >>>> _______________________________________________=0A= >>>> gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your=0A= >>>> subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:=0A= >>>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user=0A= >>>> -----=0A= >>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.=0A= >>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>> --=0A= >>> David Carlson=0A= >>> _______________________________________________=0A= >>> gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your=0A= >>> subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:=0A= >>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user=0A= >>> -----=0A= >>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.=0A= >>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>>=0A= >>=0A= >>=0A= >> --=0A= >> Not sent from an iPhone.=0A= >> _______________________________________________=0A= >> gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your=0A= >> subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:=0A= >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user=0A= >> -----=0A= >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.=0A= >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.=0A= >>=0A= >=0A= =0A= =0A= --=0A= Not sent from an iPhone.=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= gnucash-user mailing list=0A= [email protected]=0A= To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:=0A= https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user=0A= -----=0A= Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.=0A= You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.=0A= --===============0488962472323715982== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. --===============0488962472323715982==--