Re: gqview windows port
Marvin Zhang <marvin2yuer-/[email protected]> Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:52:32 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gqview.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Got you. But, I shoud say sorry that I wanna keep this project separate. The reason does no matter with my attitude to the free software, Linux, windows or something else. I just don't wanna mess the origin code. As you known, if the C code has the ability of cross-platform, it must have many many macro like #ifdef win32. Very ugly. In fact, the porting code is not elegent as orgin. Fortunately, Mingw and GTK+ for windows increase the ability of cross-platform, somehow still not enough. That's why this project does exist. As my comprehension, *nix coder can focus on their development and needn't to care about the porting. Let's pervert porting guys do the porting. Except that, I feel very funny about the nick name of some windows porting like bastard child, step child. I like those storys. We all do it for fun, do we? ;-) Alan Horkan <[email protected]> wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Marvin Zhang wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:33:01 -0800 (PST) > From: Marvin Zhang > To: Alan Horkan > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gqview-devel] gqview windows port > > The purpose of gqview-win project is just finding a place to share it. > It is not offensive to the gqview developer. Ooops, what I meant was to encourage this work and express my hope things would all be kept together. > Instead, I like gqview because of it is light so that it can run on my > aged laptop. I am very pleased if my porting code can be merged back to > gqview project. And for many examples like GTK, GIMP, Dia, ... Windows > port are very good complementarity. The port is complementary, but the seperate websites are not as good as a single website jointly promoting the latest version for both platforms. Since you mention the GIMP it is part of why I believe it is important and hope the two sites will be kept together, and the windows port treated as fully official. In the past the windows port of the GIMP was quite seperate and it seemed like a neglected step-child, and there was a certian amount of elitism. It was the existence of Free Software/Open Source for windows which got me interested in the first place and I'd hate to see something like that that happen again so I want to encourage the developers to all work together. > GQview-win is tiny, but I hope it can expand the GQview users into win32 > area. I agree, it is a great idea and I hope it does really well - Alan > > Subject: [Gqview-devel] gqview windows port > > > > I established a project for GQview windows port > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/gqview-win > > Here's hoping it can all be integrated back into GQView and allow things > to continue as a single unified project. Having two seperate pages might > make it seem like the main GQView developer didn't like the Windows port > which I don't believe is true in this case. > > Thanks for all your efforts, it will be great to soon be able to recommend > a Free Software thumbnail browser to windows users too, and have the > choice to use GQView even if I cannot choose my Operating System. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Gqview-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gqview-devel --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.