Re: Sources of the "ttable" view

mån 2003-05-19 klockan 13.55 skrev Benjamin BAYART:

Hi!

> > This is kind of coupled to the group/skill thread on mrproject-list :) 
> 
> Yes, it is, and this is one of the reasons why I prefere to have, for
> each resource:
> - one group
> - several skills

I'm not too keen on special casing skills, I mean, we can probably come
up with other such properties.

> > I'm not sure what my opinion here is yet, but I wonder what to do with
> > resources that are in no group, or what to do if we would go with the
> > skill instead of groups idea that Mikael had.
> 
> Create a (visual) "default group" ?

Or put them all under a "Ungrouped" node.
> 
> > I'm leaning towards that it would clutter up things in the common case,
> > by introducing the additional level in the tree, but that's just my
> > first thought.
> 
> Well, depends, I gave a try on some of my projects here, where the
> staff is about 40 people, it can be useful to collapse the resources
> that are not involved in *my* team when I want to have a global look at
> the time-table view...

I personally think that having the groups in the time-table view is a
good idea for the same reason Benjamin mentions. I really think that it
would be a good idea to support having a resource in several groups
though.

For example a person can be part of two seperate teams in the same
project.

Regards,
  Mikael Hallendal

-- 
Mikael Hallendal                [email protected]
CodeFactory AB                  http://www.codefactory.se/
                                Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918