RE: A first impressions with using MrProject
Richard Hult <[email protected]> 16 Jan 2003 21:40:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.mr-project.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1042749621.11311.94.camel@sliff> |
> >> 3. Perhaps should there be a quicker way to assign a ressource to the > >task ? > >> Not via task properties, but instead right from the pup-up menu ? > > > >A toolbar button and menu item that brings up the task dialog with the > >resource page active could make it easier. Having a list of resources in > >a popup menu would not be feasible though, considering that the list > >could be huge. > > You are probably right. Didn't filed. I'll file my suggestion so I don't forget :) > >> 4. You cannot set task to start from random moment in time. It would > >be > >> great, if one could move the task with mouse (perhaps with middle > >button ?) > >> in time to start earlier or later. At the moment I would need to put > >> addtional task in front of it and sent the task to depend on it and > >set a > >> lag between end and start. Not a very good way. > > > >You can do it, using constraints, which you can set in the task view. I > >agree that we need a better UI for it though. It has been planned for a > >while. > > Which version you are talking about? 0.8pre ? It has been implemented since the dawn of time, or at least from 0.6 :) (Although with a less than optimal UI...) > >> 5. If you have a big task and many subtasks under it and if you have > >some > >> external task, which depend for one of the subtask to finish to start, > >and > >> when you collapse the main task, so that you do not see subtasks > >anymore, > >> the dependency link is not no longer displayed in Gantt graph. > >> > >> Would it be possible to still display the link in some form to > >indicate that > >> the other task depends on the big task ? > > > >Good idea, we need to come up with how to visualize it. Any ideas? > > Filed as enhancement. My idea is that the link could be displayed in > collapsed view in the same place as in expanded view ? If the subtask > finishes in the middle of the super-task (is this a correct name for the big > task, which "covers" the other sub-tasks ?) the link would come out from the > middle of the big task and go to the other task. > > Or should I make a drawing to explain myself better ? Ah, I think I like this. What do other people think, does it sound like a good solution? Richard -- Richard Hult [email protected] CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/