Re: Thoughts on 0.90

Dbus is very appealing indeed.
I think if we were to use it we should not rely on the system or session
services so we would need to provide either a completly standalone
server or fallback to standalone if we cant connect to the session bus.

I think once dbus gets picked up it will eventually get ported to
windows.

On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 23:28, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 20:51, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> > > My vote goes to D-Bus. D-Bus is written to be portable so portability
> > > shouldn't be an issue.
> > 
> > 	Does Solaris currently have support for D-Bus? What about Win32
> > (where this can be easily ported)? FreeBSD? Other Unixes? Anything other
> > than Linux?
> 
> http://dbus.freedesktop.org/
> In 0.5 changelog:
>   port to OS X and other BSD variants
>   port to Solaris
> 
> Should port easily everywhere in the UNIX world. For Win I can't tell, I
> don't do that.
> As I told before, D-Bus is designed to be portable.
> 
> Hub
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Multisync-devel mailing list
> Multisync-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click