Re: Multisync configuration storage in 0.90 and beyond

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tom Foottit wrote:

> After some discussion on IRC, we wanted to solicit opinions on how we
> are going to do storage of the configuration of the sync engine (and the
> plugins) for 0.90.
> 
> Right now we have configuration stored in:
> * GConf
> * XML Files
Well, if you're going to go with XML-RPC (which persionally I'd rather see 
over D-BUS, which has fewer implementations), I'd say use XML for 
configuration files too, just for consistency.
> * Basic text (i.e. not XML) 
This is actually what I prefer, but everyone seems to want something else 
these days.
> 
> We need to standardize on something going forward. I am not opposed to
> GConf, but I would like to hear some other opinions (besides "GConf is
> like the registry") on which format we should use for storing
> configuration going forward.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Multisync-devel mailing list
> Multisync-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click