Re: Multisync configuration storage in 0.90 and beyond

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alex Perez wrote:

> 
> On Mar 11, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Tom Foottit wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alex Perez wrote:
> >
> >>> - it is not ported atm (but it will be at least according to havoc)
> >> Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah....
> >>
> >>> - it is not completly stable yet
> >> Exactly.
> >
> > Ignoring all of the advantages that Armin mentioned. I consider
> > portability to Win32 a secondary consideration, and with the amount of
> > attention dbus is getting it should stabilize before too long. We 
> > aren't
> > going to be releasing 0.90 next week - take the long view.
> Since when has popularity become the defining factor over objective 
> analysis? If it were all about popularity, we'd all be running Windows 
> XP, and we'd all be using Palm Desktop, and *this project wouldn't 
> exist*.


Who said anything about popularity? All you did is make glib remarks about 
dbus - I don't see any objective analysis there. Your remarks quite 
frankly are way out of line.

*Sigh*

Thanks to those to provided some input regarding GConf - unless anyone has 
something else constructive to add I'll consider this closed.

Tom





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click