Re: [PATCH] multisync/src patch

Bo Lincoln <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.multisync.devel
Message-ID <1078427769.2052.0.camel@munktorp>
Thanks a lot! I think you forgot the actual patch, but I reconstructed
it from your comments. It's now committed to CVS.

/Bo

On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 14:26, Stefan Behlert wrote:
> Moin,
> 
> a small patch for the src-folder:
> 
> A few warnings deleted, headerfiles included, unused variables removed.
> A few major bugs fixed:
> syncengine.c line 354: The ',' looks like a typo, I assume '&&' is the correct.
> 	Otherwise the comment for the function is plainly wrong.
> 
> syncengine.c line 447: gpointer sync_main(gpointer data) doesn't return a
> 	value. It looks to me that sync_main is only used to create the
> 	threads, and the return-value is never evaluated (I might be wrong
> 	here, please correct me if so), therefore I added a 'return NULL' at
> 	the end of the function. I'm not content with that return-value,
> 	because it is used as return in an error-case in this function, too,
> 	but I'm not sure what makes the most sense to return.
> 
> sync_vtype.c line 314 and 536: parentheses added to make parsing of && and ||
> 	clear for the compiler. Please review if the behaviour is now the
> 	intended one.  My tests say so, but I might be wrong :)
> 
> sync_vtype.c line 216: alarmaction might be used without initialization. I
> 	heavily changed the order of the code and the if-clauses in the
> 	function, please have a close look at it. 
> 	The function sync_vtype_convert() is way too big in my eyes, but that's
> 	another story :)
> 
> gui.c line 1325: parentheses problem if you use '&'. I'm not quite sure here,
> 	but the '&' should be '&&', shouldn't they? I changed both [ok, now the
> 	parentheses aren't needed, but for readability...]}
> 
> callback.s line 39: gboolean on_syncpairwin_delete_event has no return value. I
> 	think changing the return-value to 'void' should have make no troubles
> 
> 
> Well, that doesn't fix all the warnings during compilation - but most of them.
> Patches are  us usual against the cvs-version.
> It's running on my test-machine, but I can't test some of the plugins
> currently, so please review for any sideeffects in the plugins. 
> 
>         ciao,
>           Stefan
-- 
Bo Lincoln <[email protected]>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.