Re: potential memory improvement

Ken Geis wrote:
> On May 14, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Charles Kerr wrote:
>> Ken Geis wrote:
>>> I'm trying out the patch right now.
>>> When I opened the big group, Pan shows ~1.3G memory usage.  It 
>>> fetches headers for about two million parts from the servers, and 
>>> then the size is ~2.3G.  I restarted Pan, reloaded the group, and 
>>> usage is ~1.35G.
>>
>> How does this compare to the same group without the patch?
> 
> ~2050M (virtual) to load the group, ~100K parts fetched, ~2150M after 
> fetching headers.

Hm,  Going from 2G down to 1.3G is a pretty good improvement. :)

Charles