Re: Should gnome-doc-utils be a git-build dependency, now? (automake error)

Am 19.01.2012 06:54, schrieb Duncan:
> $>>cat /tmp/portage/net-nntp/pan-9999/temp/automake.out
> ***** automake *****
> ***** PWD: /tmp/portage/net-nntp/pan-9999/work/pan-9999
> ***** automake --add-missing --copy
>
> configure.in:217: installing `./config.guess'
> configure.in:217: installing `./config.sub'
> configure.in:38: installing `./install-sh'
> configure.in:38: installing `./missing'
> automake-1.11: cannot open<  gnome-doc-utils.make: No such file or
> directory
>
> Is gnome-doc-utils a new dependency?
>
> I see the changelog entries adding and tweaking the manual, which
> presumably triggers this, but can it be made optional?  As I'm a kde guy
> I'm not particularly eager to have to install scrollkeeper and gnome-doc-
> utils, but with just the one package and one additional pulled-in
> dependency, I guess it's not /too/ bad, so I probably will if I have to,
> particularly since knowing what the manual says will no doubt be of help
> answering questions on the user list.  So I probably will install it if
> necessary for the manual, but I thought you should be aware of the new
> dependency in any case.
>
I mean --without-gnome-doc-help, sorry.