Re: Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component
Dominique Dumont <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:55:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le mardi 12 février 2013 14:26:18, Dominique Dumont a écrit : > Since this is the first time I'm dealing with a trciky licensing issue, > I'd like some folks from debian-legal mailing list to confirm my opinion. As mentioned here [1], my proposal is a bad idea. GPL license is transitive. Since any change you might do upstream to fix this situation will be too late or too intrusive to be accepted for next Debian release (which is currently in deep freeze), I have no choice but to remove SSL support from Pan in Debian Wheezy. I'll put back SSL support for Pan in Debian unstable once the problematic code is relicensed or re-written. Dominique [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=22;att=0;bug=699892 _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRH0mJAAoJEMMfT9lJqytsnI0P/052z1/REIVFMgOvc74J9r0w oGsCOR9DTNRQAdkBIXvu65BFM3eMv6TNWv7jXZv82ZsE8jgBhydfa76LO0MtaZuo pMmb+23w3JHs8xTuYStWxQD1cG1G37mr003uiuB8uLQLvQlx7FYzFyyNR0qqqR3b 2naNyEWue7uOrnehqm+OmHKLtt3abkCHwh5AUXJvkrEnTNFwctHBnEw0ENIjE1W2 So87oSJqyxv/LJ4WcR7YsbeUob0xo1rclhPw+YyXaq0w6+9+CnAN2/31Vsw0ttMj IuTg4OUBlTTTHxVODEImyeOfJV2q2c90rifeOENuaWRjEdHQBDu4y+nVuQ6lEaKF 68WuhY1DFb9AbXnZEEo2cI+LY6mtCyk6zOZ/7Mj9JSyEwXq3HkXRZbYGfaw0NuAz so7X1pAyy4ZvahGFW5Ybm+o6UBTMZcyogsP4ovwola1s1QPvS8ETC4kC3o0G6t3E tSXKsVQAOjsAOpJK0HaSOdCJwd44k2lsB7BGB6Saq3f4QxjrgOkGKmV9+W8YnCxV gzPViCMXgZ1t53dcUWcKKyvzdgCO7A61ry5X2rFsyvAsdMiCoHkQKS+szsvO5Rnp gOxt7LUUlkwvI5z7Ps6dE0Vz0xllIdkIRF4wk+kQLtEm3xRC56rLCoIhn0fGHdXO RbpQ4nvEnIt7uXfjEq2/ =eckE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----