Re: Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component

Dominique Dumont <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:30:16 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hello

Le samedi 16 février 2013 14:52:15, Heinrich Müller a écrit :
> Thanks for the info, i think i'll switch over to using PolarSSL which is 
> GPLv2

I got some interesting info from Kalle:

    It looks like the license of GNUTLS 3.1.x may eventually be
    changed from LGPLv3+ back to LGPLv2.1+.  If that succeeds,
    I believe it would solve the incompatibility with Pan.
    http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-February/006086.html
 
    Alternatively, the SSL support could be rewritten to use the NSS
    library from Mozilla; that one remains GPLv2-compatible.  I don't
    know yet how different its API is.

Hope this helps

Dominique

_______________________________________________
Pan-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=ussa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----