Re: Completion should be effort invested instead of percentage of duration

Maurice van der Pot <griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.planner.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:23:24AM -0500, Kurt Maute wrote:
> I think we need to answer this question first, or my brain gets all
> twisted around:
> 
> I think you're talking about 'effort spent' - right?  
> Because to me - 'work done' is another way of saying %complete

Well, that's a difficult one to answer. For me it's more or less the
same. 

If everything goes according to plan, then spending 5 hours means
getting 5 hours worth of work done. 

Now if things turn out to be harder than anticipated and working for 5
hours on a 8 hour task gets you half way, then you'd say work done is 4?
When updating the planning you'd have to extend the task's duration to
set a realistic end date. That action would at the same time increase
the 'work' field.  So if work was 8 hours before and is now 10, then
work done should now be 5 (because you're half way done), which is again
equal to effort spent. 

Only if extending the duration would not increase 'work', would I be
willing to make a difference between 'work done' and 'effort spent'.

Note that I'm not saying I'd want it to work like this.

I'll respond to the rest of the mail later. Once I understand your idea
of effort spent and work done.

Regards,
Maurice.

-- 
Maurice van der Pot

Gentoo Linux Developer   [email protected]     http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe!       griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]   http://www.kfk4ever.com

_______________________________________________
Planner-dev-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/planner-dev-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFsoKhMGnpIbeahxwRAlmqAJ0cXjYBEto/Fu1p6zT5JKfClqOn3ACgyYgZ
ObakuvTHMYY2Rt8Qtui+qFU=
=KVJq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.