Re: Changing the way exporters work

On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 21:22 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:52:49PM -0400, Kurt Maute wrote:
> > So although we don't have to make a decision right away, I think we
> > might consider either a secondary (non-default) export format with more
> > data, 
> 
> I prefer this option. At least, if it is what I think it is.
> 
> We'd add another exporter (File -> Export -> XML for instance).
> This would be the exact format that the exporters use internally.
> It might change and users would have to adapt their stylesheets, but at
> least it does not affect the exchange of .planner files.
> 
> The .planner file would then be stripped to the bare minimum as I
> described earlier.
> 
> Is that what you meant?

Yep, that's exactly what I meant.

-- 
Kurt Maute <[email protected]>