Re: Requirements of planner 0.14.3

Maurice van der Pot <griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.planner.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 04:07:08PM +0200, Stéphane Raimbault wrote:
> I'm happy to see the planner development still alive.
> I tried to compile planner 0.14.3 on Ubuntu 8.04 but planner requires
> libxslt 1.1.23:
...
> Does it really necessary (bug, feature, etc) or can I use libxslt 1.1.22?

It is my plan to keep documenting changes in requirements in the NEWS
file (see
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/planner/tags/PLANNER_0_14_3/NEWS?view=markup).

In this case the bug was in week numbers. If the new libxslt is not
used, the week numbers in exported HTML will sometimes be off. If I
remember correctly it could happen that all week numbers in a year were
off by one.

I found this a critical enough bug for a project management application
to add the requirement for the new libxslt release. See also this
message:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/planner-dev-list/2008-April/msg00010.html

Two things may be of particular interest to you in this message. First
the thing about setting up a PPA that others can use, second the request
from an Ubuntu developer to refer anyone interested in maintaining
Planner on Ubuntu to him.

Regards,
Maurice.

-- 
Maurice van der Pot

Gentoo Linux Developer   [email protected]    http://www.gentoo.org
Gnome Planner Developer  griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]  http://live.gnome.org/Planner

_______________________________________________
Planner-dev-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/planner-dev-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIIGn3MGnpIbeahxwRAmSIAKCujWpA/kedAB8KNVEstF4ACY2c9gCfaheR
DuV1q6+TI1rYj7MzTeZyscM=
=eyaJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.