Re: Planner-list predecessors for fixed date tasks
Maurice van der Pot <griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:11:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.planner.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:14:35AM +0100, Ricardo Fernandez wrote: > is there any way to centralize a collective analyze and specification > for algorithm evolution ? > is there any conceptual documentation (exept code and its comments) for > link rules and sheduling algorithm ? > I have no time (like everyone) but should be interessed (probably like > some others) to contribute to a conceptual specification The problem is not in coming up with an idea for scheduling, it is in finding someone who is willing to work on it and stick with it. When thinking about how scheduling should work it quickly pulls in many many other things that ideal scheduling functionality requires, such as split tasks. The bigger the ideas and requirements get, the more motivation you need to actually take on the problem of implementation. Additionally it is harder to motivate someone to implement other people's requirements than it is to get them to implement their own. In my opinion discussing requirements like this will go nowhere unless the one starting the discussion is the one who plans to implement it. Look through bugzilla for this feature, you'll see what I mean. Regards, Maurice. -- Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer [email protected] http://www.gentoo.org Gnome Planner Developer griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected] http://live.gnome.org/Planner _______________________________________________ Planner-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/planner-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrrHlYACgkQMGnpIbeahxxyngCgk3ervMVgsh2W0N4StUQkAMjr mb4AnjluoD6Fy/79DkJi1DEkLe07coJs =gUYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----