Re: Planner-list Time granularity on tasks

Maurice van der Pot <griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.planner.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:11:25PM -0600, Noe Misael Nieto Arroyo wrote:
> I am playing with planner and I want to make a gant chart of my backup
> scripts (One script enters before another and we have to wait until another
> one finishes until we start synchronizing archives and so on...)
> 
> On the duration of my tasks:
> If I try to put 30 min, the program puts in ther 30 d

The space between 30 and min is confusing planner. Try 30min instead.

> If I try to put 0.5h the program puts nothing on the entry and the upper
> lever task takes into account that time. 

This is a known issue that we still have to solve
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346099
There is a patch, but it needs some more work.

> However, that time is not very
> accurate (ie: three 0.5h tasks accumulate 1h).

I do not see this problem myself. Did you zoom in far enough to see
individual hours? Please send or put online a .planner file that shows
this problem.

> So the question here is twofold:
> I am using Planner for a different purpose that it's intended use ?

Maybe a little, but I would consider these issues bugs in Planner
nonetheless. Once they're fixed you can go back to using Planner in
unintended ways ;-)

Regards,
Maurice.

-- 
Maurice van der Pot

Gentoo Linux Developer   [email protected]    http://www.gentoo.org
Gnome Planner Developer  griffon26-bCGDfOjggl9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]  http://live.gnome.org/Planner

_______________________________________________
Planner-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/planner-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl4r88ACgkQMGnpIbeahxzJMgCdFECUMnrVqIGleUIRglknjRSK
Al0AoLrod5BagJWkVRCZQsETR2aQVoUm
=CsPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.