Re: I consider orphaning pybliographer
"Douglas S. Blank" <dblank-8NN4yrnyJ/L2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:24:24 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pybliographer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, Fr=E9d=E9ric! Good luck with future projects, -Doug On Mon, April 7, 2008 5:34 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Gobry said: > Good evening! > > I've been working on pybliographer for a while now. Unfortunately I > don't use it personally anymore, which limits my incentive to continue > to do so. Recently, I've used it to try out different design and > technologies (on how to adapt various databases, how to use twisted > for querying external databases,...) which might not have been for the > direct benefit of the users. > > The global shape of the code, imho, is the following: > > * 1.2 is definitely usable, but prone to bit rot: it has no decent > tests, and some design choices limit the evolution of the code base. I > definitely don't fancy working on it as it doesn't make it possible to > run the experiments I'm interested in > * 1.3 is interesting and seems sane in terms of design. I've been > recently working on the following things: > * new external queries: arXiv is half done > * a BibTeX bst engine, so that 1.3 is able to reuse and extend > legacy bibtex formats (and integrate them in openoffice for instance) > * a new interface to modify bibtex files programatically (much > simpler than the current one, no loss on parts that are not modified > even if they cannot be interpreted fully) > > However, I definitely don't have the time to make a _product_ out of > 1.3, which is a shame. I definitely feel that people that would have a > need for the features could jump in and move the code from "proof of > concept" to "usable". I'm definitely ready to help them out and spend > some time documenting things, explaining, fixing random things, but > either I or the code turned off most of those few who were interested > in the codebase. So, despite interesting discussions (hi Zoltan, hi > Peter !), today it costs me more frustration than satisfaction. > > So I'd like to plan either the handing off or the retirement of > pybliographer. From my perspective, this means: > > * I'll be here to help out as much as possible until the end of > 2008, but won't start any new effort > * I'll then consider myself a simple subscriber to the ml and > advertise the fact the the project is frozen, to avoid misleading > potential users > * I won't renew the domain name (in 2011, this gives some time :)), > unless someone has taken over the project by then > > Thanks to all of those who contributed, either code, translation, > support, comments. This has been an interesting experience! > > Cheers, > -- > Fr=E9d=E9ric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference = Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., = Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. = http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/java= one